Like or Dislike: 0  0

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Like or Dislike: 0  0

You were paid – by the likes of me – to do a job, and I guarantee your job wasn’t to interpret the Constitution nor tasks requiring a philosophical grasp…

thor, you fat-assed semantically-idiotic piece of would-be-recipient-of-welfare-in-the-trailer-parks-if-not-for-trust-funds shit, wtf do you know about service to one’s country? It’s not just a job, it’s a commitment to service that might result in the loss of one’s life. That’s beyond the concept of just-for earning monthly pay statements (at least is was, until Bill Clinton started socially experimenting with the military).

You would do well to stick to philosophizing, in your case, philosophizing re: the continued use of McSoapHandFisting, your only area of ‘expertise’.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I’ve read other articles that spoke of pay only, and others which spoke of total compensation; so I may have mixed the fillings for my BS pie. If that’s egregiously insulting to you, then I’m gentleman enough to apologie.

But I would point out here that since I was also speaking about the added benefits of inherent job security and regular increases in salary, regardless of economic circumstance, both of which are not part of any “total” compensation, that my use of the word coupled was more correct than you give me credit for…

AS for the “non-constitutionally mandated” descriptor, it means exactly what it says. The constitution directly provides for a standing army, but only by indirect extrapolation are mandates for school teachers and astronauts contrived. Not that either are unacceptable expenses, within reason of course, and as the peoples body keeps funding them, well…

You’re right though, I’m no Chris “Tingle”-thank God! I like to think of myself as more level headed and less hyperbolic…

And MSM jingo drumming? Does tha fact that none seem to have any interest in the ideological train wreck that is Van Jones even seem curious to you? Because if I were the suspicious type, I might be thinking they’re worried about more hits to Obama’s popularity because of Jones racist, hating, outlook. Kinda smells like confirmed media bias, once again, to me…

And I’ll never get why that seem to excite, upset, or insult you so much…

Finally, thanks for the compliment; but I’ve never had the pleasure of going orbital much less lunar orbital…

But I have gone ballistic, on your nickel too; and I can tell you it was a blast!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

From total compensation there’s no need to “couple,” Johnny Afterburner.

And your “non-constitutionally mandated” descriptor, WTF is that supposed to imply? Are school teachers and astronauts mandated in the Constitution, dufus?

You were paid – by the likes of me – to do a job, and I guarantee your job wasn’t to interpret the Constitution nor tasks requiring a philosophical grasp, herr rocket balls.

You’ve gone lunar orbital, moonbeamer, and your MSM jingo drumming is primitive and tiresome. Quacking as if you’re on the level with Chris “Tingle” when your not even in his ballpark’s parking lot, you need to add some stick’um to your grip.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

And I don’t see where I’ve implied that citizens are in any way subordinate to citizen warriors. In fact it’s the other way around, considering who pays soldiers salaries as well as the fact that the military as a whole is subordinate to civilian command…

Just how was I, or any of my bretheren privileged, outside of the pleasure of operating ultra-high-performance aircraft, in my own case?

And how is any monies I recieve construed as welfare, since I worked to earn it?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Like or Dislike: 0  0