CopenChangen
Must-read piece at The Telegraph:
We have “less than 50 days†to save the planet, declared Gordon Brown last week, in yet another desperate bid to save the successor to the Kyoto treaty, which is due to be agreed in Copenhagen in six weeks’ time. But no one has put the reality of the situation more succinctly than Prof Richard Lindzen of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, one of the most distinguished climatologists in the world, who has done as much as anyone in the past 20 years to expose the emptiness of the IPCC’s claim that its reports represent a “consensus†of the views of “the world’s top climate scientistsâ€.
In words quoted on the cover of my new book, Prof Lindzen wrote: “Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly exaggerated computer predictions combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a rollback of the industrial age.â€
Such is the truly extraordinary position in which we find ourselves.
Thanks to misreading the significance of a brief period of rising temperatures at the end of the 20th century, the Western world (but not India or China) is now contemplating measures that add up to the most expensive economic suicide note ever written.
How long will it be before sanity and sound science break in on what begins to look like one of the most bizarre collective delusions ever to grip the human race?





October 26th, 2009 - 09:44
We needen’t worry about the Copenhagen update being unanimously signed; India and China will not agree to it’s terms…
What we must look out for is the subsequent push to unilaterally adopt it’s useless and insanely stringent standards…
I guess the unilateralism will suddenly be back in! That will be an interesting reversal to watch…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
October 26th, 2009 - 12:08
From the article: “How long will it be before sanity and sound science break in</em" – the answer is: when the funding dries up. As long as "scientists" are getting paid to study AGW, their research will prove the existence of AGW.
Like or Dislike:
0
0