POWIP Piece of Work In Progress

20Dec/0912

Stacy’s Blogging at New Digs

Check them out here, and update your blogroll.

Dan Collins

Dan Collins is a dude who blogs. He used to blog elsewhere. Now he blogs here.

Website - More Posts

Share
Filed under: Too Lazy to Categorize Leave a comment
Comments (12) Trackbacks (1)
  1. Patrick
    December 20th, 2009 - 18:54

    I told the guy that I *might* be able to help with hosting. Depends on his weekly numbers. I haven’t heard anything at all.

    Eh, I tried.

    -Pat

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    ( REPLY )
  2. Ann R Kissed
    December 20th, 2009 - 20:28

    Comments off?

    What!!!!!

    How can I clank the noggins of Ghoster G and Pontius Patterico together if I, well, can’t!

    I take full credit for assisting in stirring those two r-wingnuts into battle. I did what I could with what I could, meaning I can’t post over at PW and I keep getting booted from Patterico’s dumb-ridden blog hole, hahahahha.

    Back on topic, who the eff cares about RSM? Ever noticed the only time that backwoods Confederacy-worshiping slug posts here it’s to link to his crappy blog. Tin cup shaking motherfucker!

    RSM posts over at alt.africanamerican.culture (or something like that, as I was reading it the other day). Yes, he waved the confederate flag in their faces over at alt.africanamerican.culture, giving ‘em the old what’s a matter, black people, don’t like this here flag, pppp. What a class act Stacy Dixie Shakes is.

    What a turd.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    ( REPLY )
  3. Dan Collins
    December 20th, 2009 - 20:39

    I guess some people just don’t know when to stop.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    ( REPLY )
    • Ann R Kissed
      December 20th, 2009 - 20:52

      Understated understatement, Big D.

      You had to have taken a class in Lit theory, Dan. Is there one answer to defining authorial intent or many? And would the differing theorists throughout time be guided by topical American political debates or genuine differing angles that soft science theory relies on? I find it disheartening to witness the masses don’t know arguments of logos and mimesis began with the freakin’ Greek philosophers. Jeff G. is similar to Plato in that he answered the question with the incorrect answer. Then again maybe Jeff simply sneered at Derrida’s Pharmakon without actually reading it. He’s so smart like that. Hahaha, hi Ghoster, chill your willies. Hahaha.

      Tahahaha.

      It’s hard to watch, granted. I quit even looking and for a time I thought it high comedy.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      ( REPLY )
  4. Dan Collins
    December 20th, 2009 - 21:01

    There is no consequence without intention. The question is the same, essentially, as that regarding free will. You may regard it as a convenient fiction, or not. But meaningful human interaction is secured by that fiction.

    The question of where intention is to be found is a question of generosity. Theorists talk about texts manipulating people and about resistant reading. In the hands of a generous reader, such as Barthes, manhandling the text can produce beauty. Most theorists project their own ugliness onto texts, though, when they have the opportunity.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    ( REPLY )
  5. Dan Collins
    December 20th, 2009 - 21:52

    One who is willing to give credit for the most stimulating and beautiful possible interpretations of the author’s language to the author himself.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    ( REPLY )

Leave a comment

(required)


- eight = 1

Tweets that mention Stacy’s Blogging at New Digs -- Topsy.com

Subscribe without commenting

» «

Follow Dan!

Creature Commentariat

Categories

Recent Grist

Feed the Kraken.

Sponsors

Dress Shop

Blogroll

Switch to our mobile site