POWIP Piece of Work In Progress

1. 

   Ann R Kissed
   December 18th, 2009 - 07:38

   “if they’re conservative tell them you oppose it’s lack of free marklet mechanism”

   Further proving that you were either retarded at birth or grew that way in the military where they bathed, fed, clothed and wiped you prior to assigning you a purpose in life, all or which was done on the ebol gubmint welfare dime, you defenseless manure-spined bitch!

   All the best.

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   ( REPLY )
2. 

   Bob Reed
   December 18th, 2009 - 08:08

   Does the bill address portability issues in the private sector? No…

   Does it address tort reform? No…

   Does it allow for, you know, actual competition by allowing insurance companies to sell policies across state lines? No…

   And why doesn’y it do these things? Because they assumed that the trojan-horse-to-single-payer-system, euphamistically called “the public option”, would cure all ills, including putting the eeeevvoollll! insurance companies out of business…

   Oh, and the military is not welfare, but a noble and honorable profession; and of course the government pays for it you dope! I mean, it’s the defense of our nation…

   What part of national defense don’t you get?

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   ( REPLY )
3. 

   Ann R Kissed
   December 18th, 2009 - 08:14

   Yes.

   Tort reform is almost entirely a state court issue.

   Yes.

   Because insurance is normally regulated at the state level.

   Hey, Johnny Jet Fuel, learn something about which you speak before you speak and you won’t come across as you do.

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   ( REPLY )
   • 

     Bob Reed
     December 18th, 2009 - 08:24

     I’d prefer that some federal regulation be created vis-a-vis health insurance reform instead of, you know, effectively nationalizing that industry…

     Or would it be more correct to note that, much like Standard Oil did in the early days, the government would merely undercut the price until they had gained the monopoly share of the business by successfully putting all of the other companies out of business…

     I know what I’m talking about; I speak generally substantively. For instance, I don’t generally engage in strings of invecte and insult in lieu of arguments…

     Like or Dislike: 0  0

     ( REPLY )
     • 

       Ann R Kissed
       December 18th, 2009 - 08:50

       Your invective wouldn’t match mine is why you shrivel up. I read. You don’t.

       Nationalization? Much like the recent nationalization of the property and causality insurance industry, jeeenyus?

       Standard Oil was not a government entity, BTW.

       Maybe the profiteers belong in extended coverage. Your little mind can’t sufficiently grasp the entire equation and likely that’s because all the free market nonsense you pimp is a Marxist Utopian fantasy of your mind’s own making, well, more like the mind’s that author your parroted narratives, Sean Hannity, et al.

       Like or Dislike: 0  0

       ( REPLY )
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 18th, 2009 - 09:16

         Are you talking about AIG? Yeah, I opposed that too, but it was less nationaizing than a bailout. And I know you’ll erupt into one of your fits about how I know nothing, AIG was necessary, blah-blah-blah…A considerable portion of their pay-outs went to foreign central banks and Goldman Sachs; and they paid full money as opposed to the fractions that could have been negotiated if bankruotcy had been a real possibility…

         And I’m aware that Standard Oil was a private company; i was using them as an example of taking a short term loss to gain long term control over a market-like the “public option” would have done to the private insurance companies…

         And once again, you invoke Hannity, and once again only you are citing him…

         The free market is not nonsense, it’s an American institution that’s openly under assault by the statists in the Democratic party.

         And how can a free market ever be a Marxist utopian fantasy; now you’re sounding silly…

         Don’t get all wee-wee’d up on a beautiful Friday…

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Ann R Kissed
         December 19th, 2009 - 05:39

         No, Scare Pee, I was not referring to AIG, the pillar of our capitalist insurance sector.

         The government already offers flood insurance where the private sector fails in the free market yet State Farm still profitably exists. That the government already competes with prop and casualty insurers is what I referenced, d-bag.

         WalMart is an example of using loss-leader pricing, which is what you’re attempt to cite, not Standard Oil. If you knew anything about Standard Oil then you’d know they were brought down for monopolistic anti-competitive behavior, such as using Henry Flagler’s railroad while making a deal with Henry-boy so that no other competitors could.

         You don’t know anything about the “free market,” Scare Pee, and that’s because you’re a non-practicing capitalist wanna-be-boi, much the same as you’re a non-practicing Catholic. And Scare Pee, market pricing and capitalism is anything but an American institution. You hide behind facades and parrot cliches, Sean Hannity-like. That’s what you do. That’s all you know. On the sidelines, holding a bucket of water, that’s your role on team America.

         Don’t get all pee-pee’d up, Scare Pee Bob, on this glorious Saturday morning.

         If it makes you feel better, Bob, I have to go over the stock market with my buddy today. The man is attempting to better himself by learning the free markets through buying stock in a on-line brokerage account. Such enthusiasm he has so I made him my pet project. And guess what, Bob, I show him how to hold the rod, where to cast, but I alsmost never tell him what he should buy and sell. He’s got a PhD, so you know my pet has to learn everything the fuckin’ hard way. I have to show him what I do and tell him why I do it and allow him to connect the dots. Trust me, a claw hammer to his head might be quicker but then he’d simply forget everything after his concussion faded.

         So, this week, on Monday morning to be exact, he’s on and on about technical analysis and charting. I says to him “look at Southwest, LUV.” He’s all 5-day moving average, Bollinger bands, blah-blah, so I says to him “trust me.”

         I told him, if I may paraphrase, “if the market held together, notwithstanding any unexpected event or news specific to its business going forward, LUV is going higher, sure as the nose on your face, look at the chart! By how much, I don’t know. Impossible to say.”

         Being a PhD in math and loading up loads of hyperbolic indicators on your charting software doesn’t make you money. It’s knowing the basics of how to read a chart, sort’a like knowing the basics of how to read another man’s hand in poker. One can only acquire such through experience. It can’t be taught.

         I’ve experienced much capitalism. Trust me, Scare Pee.

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 19th, 2009 - 11:55

         Where to begin… Let’s start with the flood insurance riff.

         The national flood insurance program has been in effect since the late 60′s thor. It’s intent was to provide an alternative to the disaster assistanc ethe feds commonly had to provide following a flooding catastrophe. And let’s see how that’s effected the competitive rates of the private insurers, shall we?

         Oh, wait, it hasn’t! Indeed, no private companies even offer the coverage, because they can’t compete with the rates that the feds charge! And don’t try to flim-flam the argument of, “I know ‘cuz I pay it regularly”; I live at the beach to thor, 800 feet from the surf, and am well acquainted with such insurance.

         In fact, it also points to another problem with the government underwriting insurances, my man. You see, because they are on the global warming bandwagon, as an official point of view, and that same kool-aid drinking belief dictates that here must be hurrican disasters here on Long Island in the near future, *shudder-cringe-cower*, they had no problem jacking our rates up 4 years ago; for a disaster that has not yet, and may never, come in the timeframe they used to justify the increase…

         So your example is both non-actual and non-sensical…

         Next, Rockefeller’s Standard Oil did engage in the cutthroat shipping operations you mentioned, as well as the practice I described; of taking losses provincially to secure the overall market share-then increasing the price to their desired par level…

         Maybe Wal-mart does it too? I can’t say for sure, since I neither patronize nor invest in that company…

         And non-practicing Catholic or capitalist? Both are wrong I’m afraid. Being self-employed should count for some capitalistic, free market, cred. And I’ve already discussed my adherence to the tenets of my faith on previous threads.

         And it’s nice that you’d help someone else to understand investing in the stock market. But I question the whole point of the story. Was it to illustrate your “goodness”, “altruism”, or selflessness? Was it just about talking of yourself? Or was it to illustrate how you have you are sooooo much better than a mathematics PhD..?

         I don’t doubt your experience in capitalism, thor. Nor do I disagree about your intuition regarding LUV; their share of airline travel will continue to increase as it has for some time-especially since they aren’t “gougers”, and are satisfied with the margins they make such that increasing traffic will equate to increased profits…

         thor, it doesn’t have to be zero-sum between us, or between you and others. Try to look at conversation as a two-way experience where each party gets as much, or more sometimes, than they put in; it should be synergistic…

         I’m man enough to admit that you’ve made some good points in the past, will probably do so again in the future, and that I’ve learned a few things as a result of our exchanges.

         What about you..?

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
4. 

   Ann R Kissed
   December 18th, 2009 - 08:19

   You bluster stupidly.

   Do your pink ballet shoes match your tutu, you twirling little girly floater?

   Up the quality of your engines, Rocket Dawg. A updated Russian design would be practical, no?

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   ( REPLY )
   • 

     Bob Reed
     December 18th, 2009 - 08:28

     The Russians make some impressive rockets to be sure. Indeed, it’s one of the few places where the meme that they invented it has a kernal of truth; Konstantin Tsiolkovsky being the man and all…

     It helps that we have constinually whittled down NASA’s budget in favor of wealth redsitribution. That and some of the questionable projects NASA committed to under Clinton-a travesty really…

     Like or Dislike: 0  0

     ( REPLY )
     • 

       Ann R Kissed
       December 19th, 2009 - 06:14

       NASA be damned, our government has to meet its wealth redistribution obligations so that retired Naval loafers don’t have to live under a bridge and/or spend their days trolling the internet in fits of seditious delusion.

       Have you ever considered ending your pretentious holier-than-thou act long enough to celebrate events that real Americans from the more patriotic parts of America perform?

       http://www.miamiherald.com/living/health/story/1383912.html

       Suck it.

       Enjoy Aetna’s HMO, sucker.

       Like or Dislike: 0  0

       ( REPLY )
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 19th, 2009 - 10:53

         Meeting retirement obligations to folks who provided loyal service is not “wealth” redistribution; and certainly not so in the sense that it is spoken of these days…

         When you work for an employer, is it wealth redistribution to recieve your compensation as promised? I don’t think so…

         And that’s a fascinating article you linked to. Perhaps I’ll use it as a subject for a post, if I can, you know, stop my pretentious holier-than-thou act…

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Ann R Kissed
         December 19th, 2009 - 10:57

         You’re the same chump who was rooting for GM to fuck its retirees out of their retirement. Bite the hand that feeds you much?

         You got some nerve, bucko.

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 19th, 2009 - 11:16

         That’s a lie thor. You must be mixing me up with someone else. I called for the union to meet it’s obligation to the workers that they owed retirement to…

         But I did call for large wage concessions on the part of current employees as well as eliminating the “job banks” that continued to pay workers long after the factory closed or relocated; an indulgence that doesn’t make sense in any universe, and that General Motors signed under the usual collective bargaining duress that the government forces on large businesses…

         I called for the union to pay what they promised. Get your facts straight mister, before you play the hypocrisy card on me…

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Ann R Kissed
         December 19th, 2009 - 12:40

         You’re a bleeding fuckin’ idiot. The company, not the union, pays retirement to its employees.

         Jesus Christ on a stick.

         Who the fuck cares about job banks. When they lay people off they owe ‘em a severance, they’re paying ‘em anyway, and if their contract calls for a job bank then they’re entitled to it, you ebol gubmint employee welfare fool.

         I don’t even know what to say to you, you’re simply… (and a-hole, see how I used an ellipses there, that’s when you supposed to)

         If there were only a TV channel equivalent to Fux Networks where talking bobble heads screamed at photos of retired Naval pilots, “you see that lazy fuck in the photo, he worked 25-years for $25-per-hour and retired from the Navy, but look at this! Here’s a pimply-faced uneducated moron from Tennessee who says he’d have flown them Tomcats for $18-per-hour, and he can fly a plane with one hand while he scratching the chiggers on his balls with the other!”

         You’re holy-than-thou act is amazing.

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Ann R Kissed
         December 19th, 2009 - 12:41

         you’re

         holier

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 19th, 2009 - 12:59

         The fact remains that you lied about my wanting to see them cheated of their retirement benefits; and you need to look into how unions pay benefits to their members too. And on the job banks, as astonishing a connivance as they are-to pay someone in perpetuity, regarless of their years of actual service, for the indulgence of closing a factory where they had previously worked, you are correct that the companies agreed to this so they must meet their obligations; agreements that were made under the duress of government enforced arbitration with dishonest labor union…

         I’, not sure where the rest of your rant came from, or was going, but at the Navy they have judge people based on merits, like I do, and I assure you that only qualified people got assigned to the units I was with; regardless of race, creed, color, or political ideology…

         And I think you mean “your holier” not “you’re holier”, unliess I’m misinterpreting your intent…

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Ann R Kissed
         December 19th, 2009 - 14:48

         Unions don’t pay benefits, homo, they negotiate labor contracts with companies. GM pays its union employees directly. I don’t know every trade union’s arrangements but I worked in a open/union factory. I seen how it works.

         You don’t get paid for not working, for seniority you don’t have, or anything like that. Ain’t no free lunch, beeotch.

         Where do you get this shit? Fux Nutworks?

         You demonize people, Bob. Every one is ebol, except you of course. Again I proclaim, you’re a arrogant ignorant. A real puffed up self-glorifying weasel.

         Dah Mawcksists! Get down to the VA and lay down on the leather couch. The demons in your head have taken over.

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 19th, 2009 - 15:24

         You need to look up just exactly what the UAW job banks are, and how their benefits and pensions are structured…

         You’re awfully bitter for someone who is so well off…

         I don’t demonize anyone thor, I speak troooooooof! to pow-ah! And you’re just pissed right now because I blew the whistle on you over at Mr. Patterico’s.

         Why can’t you be nicer to people? Especially when they’ve cut you so much slack…

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
5. 

   Bob Reed
   December 18th, 2009 - 08:30

   So who do you stand with, tough guy? Are you with Dean and Olby, on Marxist principle? Or are you hangin’ wif Mr. O!, because of the kool-aid?

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   ( REPLY )
   • 

     Ann R Kissed
     December 18th, 2009 - 08:36

     Hey, Fuck Noodles, I’m not into your People Magazine-type of political punditry, which is all you’re about, which is but one reason you’re a boring lump, which is why we can’t debate.

     I stand with Swedish medical exceptionalism. Haha.

     Like or Dislike: 0  0

     ( REPLY )
     • 

       Bob Reed
       December 18th, 2009 - 08:42

       People magazine punditry? I’m not talking about the crease in Obama’s pants, or Michelle’s hair styles. Where so you get off with that fallacious comparison..?

       Like or Dislike: 0  0

       ( REPLY )
       • 

         Ann R Kissed
         December 18th, 2009 - 09:05

         I think Obly and Gov. Dean both make valid points. They’re not simply being dumb dicks who’ll say or do anything to distort (essentially outright lie) legislation to the public.

         Maybe I’ll invent a truth gun. I could shoot people with painful truths until they can’t lie anymore. Face it, there’s valid arguments and there’s outright fib hucksters, like you, Twaddle Bob.

         You tongue is set on lie mode. You should’a worked at a fib laboratory for the KGB.

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 18th, 2009 - 09:21

         I might believe that, at least in part, about Dean; but Olbermann is in the sturm and drang, lie and propagandize business. And either will advance their political agenda by any means necessary…

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
6. 

   Ann R Kissed
   December 18th, 2009 - 08:31

   Meet your peers.

   http://www.boeing.com/news/frontiers/archive/2005/september/mainfeature2.html

   You need more oxygen, paneemyish?

   http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2002/q2/nr_020605s.html

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   ( REPLY )
   • 

     Bob Reed
     December 18th, 2009 - 08:45

     Uhhh, thanks for the links, but I was aware of the large brain-drain from the former Soviet Union; one that benefitted the US in many ways-aerospace science and engineering being one of those ways.

     There are both benefits and drawbacks to the Russian design philosopgy; we need to maximize the former and minimize the latter for our greatest benefit.

     Thanks again for the links

     Like or Dislike: 0  0

     ( REPLY )
     • 

       Ann R Kissed
       December 18th, 2009 - 08:56

       If you witnessed their latest booster rockets I’d say the brains have drained the other way.

       My Dad once worked for Boeing. Where’d you do your design work again? Maybe you oversaw the color scheme of the buttons. Nahahahaha.

       Like or Dislike: 0  0

       ( REPLY )
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 18th, 2009 - 09:19

         That’s because you don’t know what you’re talking about; the brain drain is working in our favor still…

         And many of the specific details of my professional history are both above your security clearance and pay-grade…

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Ann R Kissed
         December 18th, 2009 - 10:38

         My Dad had security clearance. I mean, really, do you think everyone is as dumb as a midshipman?

         I killed lots of people. But that was when I was with the CIA so I can’t talk about it. That’s a Chevy Chase line from Family Vacation fer Chissakes.

         Did you know that most people know the Navy buys its weapons? I don’t think your undercover engineer act is gonna fly, ppppp!

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 18th, 2009 - 13:01

         This stuff was/is still sensitive, so say what you like, I’m not at liberty to discuss it; especially on the internet for crying out loud!

         When you have a top-secret clearance you are judicious like that; soemthing I’m sure your Dad will explain if you ask him…

         I’m sorry, but I can’t break my vow to satisfy your curiousity.

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 18th, 2009 - 13:02

         Nice pun there with the “not gonna fly”…

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 18th, 2009 - 13:03

         Because, actually, it did!

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Ann R Kissed
         December 18th, 2009 - 16:22

         Double box kites can be challenging, I’m sure.

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
7. 

   agile_dog
   December 18th, 2009 - 09:21

   Tort reform is almost entirely a state court issue.

   Tobacco lawsuits, anybody? How about drug company class action suits? These may have been filed in state courts, but they have national implications. Tort reform is seriously needed in the US, not just in the area of Medical malpractice, but in all areas (sueing McDonalds for you spilling a hot cup of coffee in your own lap because it was hot? Like the idiot would have bought it if it was cold?).

   Your invective wouldn’t match mine is why you shrivel up.
   And this is offered as the basis of your argument? You can insult better? Real strong debating point, there.

   Standard Oil was not a government entity, BTW.
   He didn’t say it was, and that was part of his point, BTW.

   I stand with Swedish medical exceptionalism. Haha.
   So when is your sex change scheduled? Or have they already cut off your balls? Is that why you are going by the name Ann now?

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   ( REPLY )
   • 

     Ann R Kissed
     December 19th, 2009 - 06:03

     Where do you come from, meaning where or what wet stain on the internet do you reside so that you know Dan Collins?

     Your such a cold blast of dumb whenever you pop up here.

     Are you referring to the famous settlement between the State AG’s and the tobacco industry or a singular suit?

     That idiot was an elderly lady who suffered severe burns to her inner thighs and vagina. They had to rebuild her labia with plastic surgery. You think that’s funny? Also, she had no financial capability to pay the huge medical costs to repair the damage, irrespective of her phenomenal pain and suffering. Who was she to turn to, except those responsible for the product that melted her skin like hot oil?

     The specifics of the case, as I recall, were that McDonald’s upped the temperature of their coffee so it was hotter than their competitors, which they concluded made it more popular with their shared customer base. Any fool with any knowledge of product safety law could have told McDonald’s selling nuclear-temped coffee was asking for trouble. The jury cited one day’s worth of McD’s coffee sales revenue for its basis of punitive damages. Precedent existed for such.

     Ever think to read the WSJ before you blabber? I mean, it was an interesting case, but mostly for the reaction it stirred amongst waterbrained headline-only readers. The case is a better example of the benefit to society of product liability law in reality.

     I’m pegging you as possibly the lessor in IQ to Scare Pee.

     Like or Dislike: 0  0

     ( REPLY )
8. 

   General Tso's Chicken
   December 19th, 2009 - 03:34

   Patterico gets onto a bus and sits next to a nun in the front seat. The Patterico looks over and asks the nun if she would have sex with him.

   The nun, surprised by the question, politely declines and gets off at the next stop. When the bus starts again, the bus driver says to the Patterico, “If you want, I can tell you how you can get that nun to have sex with you.”

   Patterico of course says that he’d love to know, so the bus driver tells him that every Tuesday evening at midnight the nun goes to the cemetery to pray to the Lord. “If you went dressed in robes and some glowing powder,” says the bus driver, “You could tell her you were God and command her to have sex with you.”

   Patterico decides to try this out. That Tuesday, he goes to the cemetery and waits for the nun. Right on schedule, the nun shows up. While she’s in the middle of praying, Patterico walks out from hiding, in robes and glowing with a mask of god. “I am God, I have heard your prayers and I will answer them but you must have sex with me first,” he says.

   The nun agrees but asks for anal sex so she might keep her virginity. Patterico agrees to this and quickly sets about having sex with the nun.

   After Patterico finishes, he rips off his mask and shouts out, “Ha ha, I’m Patterico! ”

   The nun replies by whipping off her mask and shouting, “Ha ha, I’m the bus driver…who is really thor!”

   And Karl smiles at the irony.

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   ( REPLY )
9. 

   Ann R Kissed
   December 19th, 2009 - 06:45

   Phi Slamma Jamma is thor, a trollish person from waaaaaay back…

   He’s a world class poseur, race card player, and accuser of RAAAAAACISM! for the slightest crotocosm of the won…

   Ask Karl about thor from PW, he’ll explain the nature of his character…

   Don’t say I didn’t warn you all…

   Look at our little Scare Pee, been punked so hard and often he’s grown bitter with rage! HAhaha!

   Come on little boy, come to the front of the stage where I can see your face. I’ll show you the buena, buena, good, good! That’s from a song, Scare Pee, by Morphine. I believe the metaphoric lyrics are about drugs, but with intentionalism and all who can really say.

   What’s it like to get punked everywhere you go outside the fishbowl of autistic r-wingies? Hahahaha, should’a read a book instead of flying them kites.

   You’re so emblematic of the broken and failed metanarrative. The future is not yours. I hope your forward suffering is limited by your ability to marginalize yourself. Flat earth theory will, like Bob, eventually pass. America will be better for it, praise Jesus.

   Anyone want to debate Lit theory, Dan, anyone?

   Like or Dislike: 0  0

   ( REPLY )
   • 

     Bob Reed
     December 19th, 2009 - 11:09

     Perhaps I chose my words poorly, and should have used “sock-puppeter” instead of “poseur”, for that I apologize. But the fact remains that Patterico doesn’t want you trolling at his place either, and I simply felt like I should give them the heads-up on your calling cards…

     Like I said, you need a new schtick. I can find you just about anywhere, under any monicker-of-the-day you choose at the time, simply by googling the combination of Marxism, Foucalt, Celine, Derrida, Chomsky, and Russia. Chances are good that you’ll turn up under one of the links…

     How am I representative of whatever “meta-narrative” you insist is broken? And just how has it been broken; by your kool-aid meister Obama?

     I don’t get punked anywhere I go thor, I deal in facts, reason, and logic and can hold my head high about anything I’ve done, said, or written…

     Can you do the same?

     Stop looking at me, and others, as an adversary to be bested, but as someone to converse with and grow from that experience; which is generally what I do…

     Like or Dislike: 0  0

     ( REPLY )
     • 

       Ann R Kissed
       December 19th, 2009 - 15:10

       What a dipweed you are. I don’t post anywhere but here generally, as in I don’t have as much free time on my hands as you, evidently.

       Poor defenseless Patterico, yet he works in the DA’s office, save us dear Jesus, save us.

       Goldstein’s intentionalism holds not-so-much water anywhere but in his head, well, besides yours and all the rest of the PW waterheads. You sheeple are so easily sheepled.

       Who defines authorial intent? Foucault’s answer is whoever has the power to do so, meaning the most powerful, in other words the victors write/re-write history as they see fit. Make sense? It’s undergrad stuff, that’s why, as is Jeff’s signifiers and referents. Poor babies, so gullible, so American, so PW’d. Pick up a book on lit theory, lazy boi, for you have not a clue what facts, reason and logic are, frankly. You wouldn’t know who Chomsky was if he was on top of your wife.

       Go find me, Google away.

       Like or Dislike: 0  0

       ( REPLY )
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 19th, 2009 - 15:31

         Was that supposed to be a punking? And why do you need to lie about posting in other places.

         Let’s try a new dynamic thor. Let’s try being civil and less dimissive and condescending of other’s opinions and ideas…

         What about it?

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Ann R Kissed
         December 19th, 2009 - 21:51

         I don’t think so, fart pump.

         If all I have to do is grab a book from my library or open a spiral notebook of my notes from Lit Theory 101 in order to punk that circus bear ‘rassler Goldstein, yet, all the while, I’m the one who sat in front of a Bloomberg for 15-years and did the Capitalist-hero gig on Wall Street.

         Explain to me why I need to practice patience with you numb-headed know-it-alls of finance and lingua gossip.

         You’re half-cocked dumbasses … foil triangles. Simple. Go ice fishing or rub yourselves against tree stumps or whatever it is you cousin-licking hicks do. I took the time to study because … service of the queen … the rain king … Falstaff’s refrain… dots … foul smelling wretched and poor … shame my family name … shittier than shit … shouts and yells … emancipated maniacs … didn’t want to die dumb like that.

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 19th, 2009 - 23:42

         Have you been drinking, or otherwise?

         The reason you show patience, are more understanding and less dismissive with other folks are because that is what a gentleman of honor erudition, learning, grace, and noble bearing would do; you do it because it’s the right thing to do…

         There are subject about which you know much more than the rest of us, that is a certainty. But, it might surprise you to consider that there are also ones where the folks here might know as much or more of than you.

         I admire some of your experiences and education, and am certain you could regale us with a lot of “war stories”. If you were more gracious to folks I’m sure they’d want to hear more of them, instead of simply argue with you. And if you turned over a new leaf, perhaps you’d be un-banned at PW and could talk all the lit theory with Jeff G that you wanted.

         But I am perplexed by the string of phrases you put together at the end of that last comment. What do they mean?

         Consider being more gracious; take the advice of someone with experience who knows better.

         Sleep it off and we’ll talk again.

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Ann R Kissed
         December 20th, 2009 - 09:34

         Hahaha, yeah, I had a little white lightning running through my veins and a pastiche of intercoursing words violating my head.

         Now sober, they don’t read so bad. Ahahaha.

         What, less name calling? With Bono’s accent, am I buggun’ ya yet! Are the lights of London turning red from green?

         While burning your white crosses will you quit raising the American flag?

         You don’t speak of the America I know, Mister! The America of my birth rite doesn’t turn its back on the homeless, the poor, the sick and dying, none of its huddled masses.

         “The God I believe isn’t short of cash, Mister! I feel a long way from the hills of San Salvador where the sky is ripped open and the rain pours through a gaping wound pelting the women and children who run, who run, who run into the arms of America.”

         The promises America made! They in horrible need run for to it! Yet! Did you Lie! To the impoverished women and crying children, did you offer them false hope?

         And if there is a God, what will you say to him as you stand before him if he asks whether you extended God’s mercy onto your fellow man? What are you going to say? That you used a stick, strung a piece of rotten meat to it and dangled it above the heads of the old, withered and sick? That according to the Laffer Curve as long as you got yours that all was OK? That offering your fellow man, the broken-others, a chance dance for amusement was better than outright teasing their starvation and condidtion? That Coltrane’s Love Supreme played as your frivolity reigned Supreme?

         Or will you be able state to God that while on earth you exalted the name of Christ? That you didn’t simply take, that you gave to those in need in return for the blessing of the health and wealth the son of God bestowed, in his infinite mercy, unto you!

         Here in the Lost and Found department, we have a new puppy named Scare Pee.

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
       • 

         Bob Reed
         December 20th, 2009 - 11:26

         Burning white crosses? While raising the American Flag? You’re kidding, right..?

         Christian charity is about extending oneself to help others, individually giving all you can. It is not about giving other people’s money away to assuage your personal notions of charity. I won’t blow my horn again, especially since we’ve discussed my ministereal outreach to those less fortunate organized through my parish several times before.

         My conscience is clear. Is yours?

         I give of my time, talent, and treasure to assist both the less fortunate as well as others in my community. I’ve been out shoveling, the nearly 2 feet of snow we recieved here, for thise in my neighborhood who can’t; to help ease their burdens.

         What have you done for others today?

         I walk the talk I lay down, do you? Think hard about that before you try to throw the hypocrisy card, or the racist card, on me again…

         The cliche says that you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. Take my counsel from last night to heart. And remember that a gentleman of honor erudition, and learning, conducts himself with courtesy, grace and a noble bearing.

         Are you a gentleman, or a punk..?

         Like or Dislike: 0  0
10. 

    obesidad infantil
    August 7th, 2011 - 17:42

    My spouse and i got quite relieved when Edward could finish up his studies through your precious recommendations he gained in your web pages. It is now and again perplexing to simply find yourself offering ideas the rest may have been selling. We figure out we’ve got the writer to give thanks to for that. The entire explanations you made, the straightforward site menu, the relationships you can assist to engender – it’s everything overwhelming, and it’s leading our son and our family recognize that the idea is pleasurable, and that is unbelievably indispensable. Many thanks for everything!

    Like or Dislike: 0  0

    ( REPLY )

Leave a comment Cancel reply