POWIP Piece of Work In Progress – Former Abode of Dan Collins

24Jan/105

Climategate and Charles Johnson

The Douche of URL claims that he came belatedly to the AGW camp because he read the evidence for the claims, for and against. There are three fundamental and not mutually exclusive explanations, here: 1) he's naive; 2) he's stupid; or 3) he's dishonest.* Frankly, I don't care which of the above he is, but if he really has read the evidence, it certainly puts the lie to his claims of rationalism.

*

Dan Collins

Dan Collins is a dude who blogs. He used to blog elsewhere. Now he blogs here.

Website - More Posts

Share
Comments (5) Trackbacks (1)
  1. Charles Johnson…? Rational…? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! That’s funny. Oh wait, I’m not done laughing yet… BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I feel better now.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. I don’t get how skepticism wouldn’t be the default just cause the narrative is so sketch… but a lot of otherwise smart people are big climate change pansies.

    Gullible is I guess what you call it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • He makes the claim that he’s inspected the evidence. I am at a loss to understand how a rational person can do that and come to the conclusion that there’s significant AGW.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Okay, I read the tea leaves and thought–”Hey, all the cool kids are for global warming.”

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0


Leave a comment

(required)


seven + = 11

Subscribe without commenting

Switch to our mobile site