24Jan/105
Climategate and Charles Johnson
The Douche of URL claims that he came belatedly to the AGW camp because he read the evidence for the claims, for and against. There are three fundamental and not mutually exclusive explanations, here: 1) he's naive; 2) he's stupid; or 3) he's dishonest.* Frankly, I don't care which of the above he is, but if he really has read the evidence, it certainly puts the lie to his claims of rationalism.





January 24th, 2010 - 16:08
Charles Johnson…? Rational…? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! That’s funny. Oh wait, I’m not done laughing yet… BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I feel better now.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 24th, 2010 - 18:57
I don’t get how skepticism wouldn’t be the default just cause the narrative is so sketch… but a lot of otherwise smart people are big climate change pansies.
Gullible is I guess what you call it.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 24th, 2010 - 19:04
He makes the claim that he’s inspected the evidence. I am at a loss to understand how a rational person can do that and come to the conclusion that there’s significant AGW.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 25th, 2010 - 02:30
Okay, I read the tea leaves and thought–”Hey, all the cool kids are for global warming.”
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 25th, 2010 - 03:57
Here’s to hoping you win a Darwin Award, Chuckie! Cheers!!!
Like or Dislike:
0
0