Don’t be asinine
The above was a favorite saying of my granddaddy, a way of saying "Don't be a dumbass" without getting my grandma to yell at him.
This reaction comes from the following two items: various states passing texting-while-driving bans, and a study of how handheld-phone-use-while-driving bans did bupkis for crash rates.
Mercy me, just telling people not to be idiots didn't work. I wonder why.
I am tired of the biglonglist of stuff that if you were not an idiot, you'd know not to do it. These laws don't stop dumbasses [might change their specific acts of dumbassery, but unlikely], and you don't really need all these extra laws to punish those who endanger the public -- we already have laws against reckless driving, for instance.
If we must enumerate every single dumbass thing not to do while driving, we'll end up with don't-browse-for-porn-on-your-iPad-while-driving law. Do we need to explicitly tell people this? Isn't it implicitly illicit already?
I ran into this checklist of idiocy problem when I was staff at Mathcamp. Before the campers arrived, we needed to figure out the rules, but given these are very clever teens, and likely to outwit any too-specific rule we set, we came up with the Rules of Mathcamp:
0. Be excellent to one another.
1. Don't do stupid stuff.
2. No fire.
3. Don't divide by zero, except under staff supervision.
Now, being teens, they invariably did stupid stuff [and weren't excellent to each other]. But when we told them to knock it off, and pointed to the rules, generally the presence of stupidity or the lack of excellence was evident to all. [I never had a problem with the fire rule, and rule 3.... well, okay, I was pretty lax there. I let the results be their own punishment.]
If only we could replace law in general with the above rules.
RELATED: "It's the stupidity that brings people down". Thanks for the advice, Mr. Spitzer.





January 30th, 2010 - 09:09
YES – thinking that more rules will somehow improve behavior is naive. Any parent can attest to that. But it seems lawyers only know one solution to any problem: law. And if that doesn’t work, more law. I work at an Army installation where, several years ago, they prohibited cell phone use while driving. The installation’s version of chief of police remarked that he thought it foolish. More problems would be caused by drivers pulling over to answer the phone than talking! I’m guessing he had a better sense of the reality since he dealt with it on a regular basis.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 31st, 2010 - 12:24
Meep – I put a post up at Cold Fury on the ‘Tall woman – Short man’ topic on The Frisky (via Insty) Dan Collins suggested I bring it to your attention.
Here is the post:
http://coldfury.com/?p=21925
Like or Dislike:
0
0