POWIP Piece of Work In Progress

22Jan/1013

=That’ll= Shock Those Rubes!

One of the more amusing parts of the meltdown over Scott Brown is the lefties throwing what they think is dirt on the Browns out there, but it turns out they're throwing bouquets.

First, I'll link to the stuff the guys will like -- the shot of Brown with his bikinied daughters [didn't realize how tall one was] and the music video Mrs. Brown was in in the 80s. I'm not quite sure what is supposed to be beyond the pale here. Let's just look at the 80s video - are we supposed to be offended by the pure awfulness of the song [and that title... "The Girl with the Curious Hand"?! WTF?!] Or is it that she's wearing a bikini? Or that she's wearing makeup and earrings with the bikini on the beach, but is not also wearing heels? Or that she's pretending to poison a guy? Or that she didn't in reality poison the guy? Help out a [c]hick here.

Then the shot I really like - Mr. Brown's Cosmo shot when he was a young hunk [as opposed to being a middle-aged hunk now]. [What's this? He may be in Cosmo again? [no, can't get a reliable story on that] ... Probably wearing a suit, though. Well, I like a sharp-dressed man, too.]

I could see the pics of Brown himself perhaps being taken poorly -- in Mississippi. But even then, they would have had to have appeared in Playgirl and be actually nude.

In any case, in pretty much all these cases the "dirt-throwers" aren't offended by the pictures or videos themselves... but they thought would-be Brown voters or supporters would be... again, in Massachusetts.

I have come across this before, many times, as a orthodox Roman Catholic [by which I mean that yes, I really do believe that stuff, and I love my German Shepherd] and as a Southerner. People think they're being "transgressive" and will shock the rubes by sticking a crucifix in a jar of urine, or in writing a play about turning women into a talking body part [wait, I thought it was we knuckle-dragging religious types who objectified women]. Take that, mackerel snappers!

I find the whole thing very puzzling, in that these people pride themselves as being very knowledgeable, but cannot figure out what would be actually offensive to Massachusetts voters, even the conservative ones. We might be social conservatives, but we're not the group who thinks females ought to be covered in black tents. These people keep crowing about eschewing stereotypes, and then invent some cardboard cutout idea of what a conservative is.

Well, if you're willing to learn, we can teach you [and you can find out what actually offends us... say, politicians bellying up to the taxpayer trough], but I'm guessing that we'll be in for similar pseudo-outrages all this year. I think I need to invest in some pudding stock.

Meep

Meep is a member of the Irish Catholic mafia, having a suspiciously high number of green-eyed, red-haired friends. While she doesn’t have red hair herself [except when she goes into the sun (rare for any vampire)], she does have green eyes. She’s a raving Papist and is a life actuary on the side [i.e., she counts dead people]. An amateur pain-in-the-ass [willing to go pro!], she likes covering retirement, mortality, math, and education issues.

Share
Comments (13) Trackbacks (0)
  1. So, what you’re saying is you lied about the poker game.

    The artsy kids actually took all your lunch money.

    And you’re still feeling the burn, still fuming, still soaking.

    Get over it already, Dumb Lady.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Interesting reasoning there.

      I played that group of people only once. What’s kind of odd is that they were too conservative in their betting – they wouldn’t bluff!

      The medical students on the other hand… yowza. Crazy game in the opposite direction. They were the sharpest poker players I’ve ever played with [but I'm not that good, so take that for what it's worst]

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Hey, doll face, I know poker, you don’t. Everyone knows hole card-odds and pot-odds when you play with real players. That don’t require much jeeenyus.

        Good players play a lot. That’s their secret, practice. Duh.

        Every person isn’t a symbol of cheap generalizations needing your interpretation. Well, unless you’re really good at it, and you’re not.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. It was offensive in its offensiveness.

    Um . . . chickenhawk! Hypocrite! Um. Rethuglikkkan!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Interesting, your’s is the second site today that I’ve visited with this opportunity. I’ll keep an eye on it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Affaire à suivre, bonne continuation.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. This page appears to recieve a large ammount of visitors. How do you advertise it? It gives a nice unique twist on things. I guess having something real or substantial to post about is the most important factor.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Good post :)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0


Leave a comment

(required)


four + 9 =

No trackbacks yet.

Subscribe without commenting

Switch to our mobile site