POWIP Piece of Work In Progress – Former Abode of Dan Collins

23Nov/105

Is a resumption of the Korean War on the Thanksgiving Day menu?

Regrettably, it may be, if yesterday’s artillery exchange, and the escalating rhetoric, is any indication.

Tensions between the two nations have been high as of late for what analysts say are manifold reasons.  Some South Korean sources believe that the aggressions are a contrivance to promote national, and more important perhaps top military brass, solidarity behind Kim Jong-Un, the youngest son of Kim Jong-Il; to “blood” the new ruler so to speak.  Other western analysts see the most recent action as a perverse sort of “signal” to the US that it needs to resume the 6 party peace talks that were suspended two years ago; a possibility that was categorically ruled out again, at least in the short term, on Saturday following the revelation by North Korea of a new uranium enrichment facility.  Or it may just be Kim Jong-il  continuing to test Obama's "mettle" in the wake of the administration's weak responses to both the sinking of the Cheonan and last year's missile tests by the regime.  But whatever the underlying motivation, it’s hard to see how today’s exchange can do anything but fuel the anger and resentment of the South Korean people, especially after last spring’s sinking of the South’s Corvette, which resulted in 46 deaths, an action for which the North still denies any responsibility.

Tuesday’s artillery exchange, perhaps the most serious cross-border incident since the Korean war, took place on, and in the vicinity of, the island of Yeonpyeong, approximately 75 miles west of Seoul, near the disputed Yellow Sea border with the North: the same area where the Cheonan was sunk in March.  Now, artillery exchanges have taken place many times before, in the region of the De-Militarized Zone, but what is different this time is that civilians were involved.  In addition to reports of the destruction, or damage, of 70 houses, at this time the reported casualties are 2 Marine killed, 16 Marines injured, and 3 civilians injured.

As is generally the case, the North maintains that the South Koreans provoked the fire by conducting military exercises in the region; the South has admitted that such exercises were underway off the west coast of the Korean peninsula, but state that they crossed no borders and none of their fire was directed towards the north.  North Korea initiated the action by firing what is believed to be 200 artillery rounds at a military base located on the island, some shells striking the adjacent town.  South Korean forces responded via 80 rounds of return fire, which I assume was counter-battery in nature, at the offending North Korean artillery units---although this is not specified in any of the reports.  They have also sent some F-16’s to the area, and South Korean President Lee Myung-bak has warned that he will order “stern retaliation” to any further provocation from the North, going so far as to openly threaten to strike a missile base located near the offending coastal artillery locations.

The U.S., EU, UK, Russia, and Japan have condemned the North Korean attack, calling it a belligerent action.  North Korea's principal ally, the Chinese, has refused to do so stressing instead that both sides must do more to contribute to peace.  Which, you know, is not an entirely shocking development from the nuclear-equipped rogue regime's chief enabler.

This is one of those events that can't be planned for by any administration; let's hope and pray that Mr. Obama's team is up to the task.  Being a hawk, it's no surprise that I think it's way past time to get tough with North Korea; but that may only be a path to more bloodshed.  So instead, let's pray for God's guidance for all those involved.  Also, let's pray for the Korean people on both sides of the DMZ, and that their governments see the error of their ways, where applicable, and arrive instead at a peaceful resolution to their dispute.

Share
Comments (5) Trackbacks (0)
  1. Now, let’s see. Where were we?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. McArthur was right. We should have nuked the Red Chinese and finished this way back then.

    Unpopular to say then, and now. But me? I’d be launching a B-2 raid on their nuclear facilities, to make sure that Kim Jong-il got the message.

    Oh, and I’d tell that POS that if he retaliated, we’d shoot down his missles, and friggin nuke ‘em til the entire peninsula north of the 38° parallel was a night light for that part of Asia.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. I thought Communists would usher in a more HUMANE era… I mean, Hopey Changey and all. Someone should tell Obama about this.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Kim Jong-il won’t leave this world without playing with his toys for awhile. Meanwhile, little -un is looking around like a kid in a candy store; he can’t wait to get NUKES!.

    Someone should infiltrate and assassinate the both of ‘em, and soonest. I said that about Saddam Hussein too, before the war started; did anyone listen to me?

    Ford, Carter and Reagan cost a lot of innocent lives with their no-assassination executive orders. Mistakes, all of ‘em. We should always go for the heads of the snakes, at the least possible cost in innocent lives.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. The North therefore has three major interlocutors who are fixed quantities. SK, Japan, and the US are all willing to show force as a deterrent but would prefer to buy peace. It has another, China, which like South Korea and Japan stands to get a lot of grief if the regime goes under, but is far less committed than South Korea. Therefore, China is the swing factor. They’re involved but nowhere near as much as other Koreans are.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0


Leave a comment

(required)


six - 3 =

No trackbacks yet.

Subscribe without commenting

Switch to our mobile site