My Last Words on Loughner? [UPDATE]
I hope so. At least until the trial. There's not a whole lot more meaning that can be derived from the event, in my opinion, and when even the NYT is delivering pseudo-apologies through its ombudsman, it seems as though the forces of slander are in full retreat, even though dead-enders like Kinsley don't know that they've had their asses handed to them, yet. Even Time recognizes it's a losing call. The feds who have searched through the evidence with the kind of thoroughness and urgency news bureaus would give to Palin's garbage haven't found any right-wing rhetorical smoking gun.
I know that the far left are feeling betrayed over Obama's unambiguous (it seems to me) statement that Loughner's atrocity had nothing to do with political rhetoric. It marks a significant advance in intelligence on the part of President Stupidly's own rhetoric, and is perhaps an early indication that this Daley fellow from Chicago has brought a sense of reality to the White House, whether or not that White House is being directed by radical daughter Valerie Jarrett, as is asserted once again by Ulsterman's mysterious Insider. How he's managing to escape detection, I'm not sure, but at this point the White House has probably detailed significant resources to finding out who he is.
Here is something that you will never hear from the media but that some witnessed shortly after the memorial service had finished. Behind the staging area, Obama gave Michelle a “high five” and shared a laugh with her. So within minutes of seeing what is Obama’s finest moment as president it is followed by one of his worst. It is this easy and always there contradiction in the president that concerns me very very much. He was just thrilled at his performance. That was priority #1 for him. It always is. The motivation for his speech was not to heal following the tragedy, but to further appeal to the public and get their approval of him. It’s similar to that story I told you about Obama coming into the military meeting at the WH. He came in laughing and left early laughing. Maybe a photo of the high five will be released? I was told one was taken at any rate. I cannot reconcile with that kind of behavior in a leader. There really is something missing in him. Some basic element of humanity. Or humility??? Even by DC political standards the human element in Obama seems to be utterly absent. I don’t get it. I don’t understand it. And that scares the hell out of me. So that’s my assessment of the Tucson speech.
Insider is a disgruntled Hillaryite--something he never tries do hide--and expresses disappointment that she didn't seize the opportunity handed to her by some deep-pocketed people to begin preparation for a 2012 run. He seems to believe that she has missed the window of opportunity. At the same time, the usual MSM apparatchiks are touting probably deeply flawed polls showing Obama's national approval at 54% and opposition to HCR waning, as prophylaxis.
At the same time, and possibly in response to the RNC's election of Reince Priebus to National Chair, he feels that Palin has been neutralized, at least as an electoral threat. One snarky Twitter pundit was asking last night if any nationally known Republicans were not assembling exploratory committees in the lead up to 2012. Oddly enough, I think that the House Republicans' reluctance to sign on to Paul Ryan's economic road map boosts the odds that he will shake out to be the nominee, triangulating between the inexperience of Palin (underscored this week by Chris Christie) and the lifer mentality of eternal will-o-the-wisp McCain. The fundamental difference between Palin and McCain is that she has principles, which is why she's demonized and he's lauded by the MSM and the left commentariat.
Incidentally, Insider makes mince-meat of the idea that the U of Arizona had no Team Obama input for the "Together We Thrive" t-shirt debacle:
The things happening outside the speech though left many of us wondering who was in charge of planning the event because that environment was almost a disaster. You were right to call into question the t-shirts. That was in very poor taste. The excuse that the Obama administration had nothing to do with those t-shirts is completely false. Every detail is run by the administration on this kind of event. Every last detail. Also, many who had attended were actually coached to be “very supportive” of President Obama.
Not that that would sway PolitiFact, who weigh some hearsay evidence more than other. He goes on to say that Issa's projected investigations are causing suppressed panic in the White House. It's going to be interesting to see what the MSM make of the tell-all books as they begin to come out. Whether Obama's in trouble politically or not in the run-up to 2012 is going to depend largely on the ability of alternate media to put the spotlight on the issues that will be elided in favor of media-circus bullshit like the right-wing responsibility for Loughner. Which is why I want to wrap this up, though the topic remains open to others here, if they want to pursue it.
Also, there haven't been enough posts on breasts, recently.
Stacy's been doing a bang-up job investigating what's in the Zeitgeist conspiracy video that had such a profound impact on Loughner, by way of externalizing and justifying his paranoia, just as Freud saw in the physical symptoms of shell-shock a hypercathexis against trauma--trauma that in this instance was inflicted by the onset of schizophrenia, which is clearly visible in its cortical manifestations, so long as one has X-ray specs. Having discovered this connection was undeniable, the lefty lunatics have been busy trying to paint the video as the product of wingers, despite its being the work of New Age conspiracy wackjobs.
Speaking of which, in a speech in Doha, Qatar, Seymour Hersh stamped his passport to the Outer Limits:
“That’s the attitude,” Hersh continued. “We’re gonna change mosques into cathedrals. That’s an attitude that pervades, I’m here to say, a large percentage of the Joint Special Operations Command.”
Hersh also alleged that General Stanley McChrystal, who headed Joint Special Operations Command before becoming the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, and his successor, Vice Admiral William McRaven, as well as many within JSOC, “are all members of, or at least supporters of, Knights of Malta.”
“Many of them are members of Opus Dei,” Hersh continued. “They do see what they’re doing — and this is not an atypical attitude among some military — it’s a crusade, literally. They seem themselves as the protectors of the Christians. They’re protecting them from the Muslims [as in] the 13th century. And this is their function.”
“They have little insignias, these coins they pass among each other, which are crusader coins,” he continued. “They have insignia that reflect the whole notion that this is a culture war. … Right now, there’s a tremendous, tremendous amount of anti-Muslim feeling in the military community.”
These are the mutterings of a fevered, obsessive mind. His strange, conspiracy-plagued world is dominated by neo-conservatives and Opus Dei crusaders who are reliving the 13th century. Such writers now find a welcoming home at the New Yorker.
So, here we have the spectacle of a Jew warning Muslims that the Pope is trying to take over the world. Awesome.
Speaking of etiolated connections, it's been discovered that the high school that Loughner attended was backed by Ayers-Obama Annenberg funds, and pursued an alternative curriculum. That's interesting, but unfortunately the pseudo-intellectual anthropological relativist gibberish that was stuffed into Loughner's head comprises a large portion of the paedeia of virtually any public school these days. Less stretchy, IMO, is the theory that Gisele Bundchen was planted by the New York Jets into Tom Brady's life to rob him of his mojo. For the moment, I don't even want to consider the Albolene conspiracy, outlined by Suzette, who along with Fausta attended a soiree at Bingley's, whose blog mentioned us favorably over the weekend, and whose birthday it is today. So go over there and congratulate him.
Meanwhile, the Tucson Tea Party guy that got threatened by left-loony Fuller has news for Sheriff Dipstick:
It has just come to my attention that a spokesperson for the Sheriff’s Department made the following statement on Saturday evening after the town hall, “If Humphries decides not to press charges, the charges will be dropped”. At no point was this information ever related to me before the statement was given to the press. I was actually led to believe the opposite. It was my understanding that because of the very public nature of the offense that charges would be filed regardless of my participation. Indeed, it is up to Pima County Prosecutor Barbara Lawall, and not the Sheriff’s Department, to decide that charges will be “dropped”. Like so much other misinformation reported this past week, the statement from the Sheriff’s office would appear to be an error of the press or another grave misunderstanding on the Sheriff”s part.
Post-deconstructionist Stanley Fish finds merit in Palin's latest book. Thoughts on the characterization of the psycho (well, what was Iago?). More on Fuller's background, and Dupnik.
Belated thanks to Pundit and Pundette and Maggie's Notebook for linking us up over the weekend, while Amanda Peet turned 39.
Finally, for Enoch, worst marketing post ever. Speaking of which, I'd better get back to work.
UPDATE: Welcome, Morons! Thanks for the link, Andy.
UPDATEx2: You know what you're doing when you're waiting for the bus in Tucson? Thriving. Unbe-freakin-lievable.





January 18th, 2011 - 17:03
Thanks, Dan!
We’ll save you room at the table next year!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 18th, 2011 - 19:29
Nice column. I wish HA would link our own conservative bloggers more instead of crap by Politico, Daily Beast, blond bimbos, etc.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 18th, 2011 - 19:39
Thanks, Blake. I don’t think they’d get as great a return on their linkvestment, in my case, though. Green Room has some good contributors.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 18th, 2011 - 19:54
And some not-so-good ones.
We won’t mention Allahpundit, who sent me a seriously nasty email threatening to ban me once.
It turns out that one cannot use the word “revolution” at Hot Air. I was commenting on something completely irrelevant to either the U.S.G. or Ron Paul, and used the word.
My comment went to moderation.
Not being a complete fool, I tossed about three more posts at the subject, and confirmed my suspicions about what word was unacceptable.
I don’t go back very often. It’s not really my kind of place, truth be told. Between the squishy conservative ethic and the paranoia about the use of certain words, I don’t need to be there.
So it goes.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 18th, 2011 - 20:15
Was that pre- or post-Human Events buyout?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 18th, 2011 - 20:31
Pre, IIRC.
But only by a month or so.
And I simply quoted the Beatles in the next post that got sent to moderation to confirm my suspicions.
“You say you want a Revolution, well you know……”
Heh.
After the little temper tantrum that he threw at me over that, I concluded that it wasn’t my kind of place, because he either didn’t notice what I’d said in the first place, or what I was confirming. He just had a little, and slightly profane, cow at me.
Oh, well. I got tossed from LGF. Some day I may well wind up tossed from Hot Air, too. I know how to yank the right chain if I want to be.
If they need more Moderators, they could get them, I ‘spect. Otherwise, I know where they are coming from, and in spite of not being a big Ron Paul fan, I can’t see banning regular words. (I really avoid profanities or obscenities when I post anywhere. I’m a mean old man, but I’m not that crude.) Beyond that sort of thing, it seems to indicate some kind of paranoia.
“OMG! Someone said the word “Revolution” at Hot Air! They’re all a bunch of secessionist Militia people over there!”
Or whatever. I can take a hint.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 18th, 2011 - 21:04
You know, Jeff with his OUTLAW! and I with Civility NOW! were both talking about how the libs’ calls for civility just meant shut up back in 2007, maybe earlier. We were dismissed as extremists.
Now it’s the hot conservative meme.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 18th, 2011 - 21:32
Yep.
I was a card-carrying Bircher in High School. I got over that in the early 1970′s and went (Large “L”) Libertarian for a few years. Then I got over that, too.
But I’ve never felt the need to be approved of by the elect, or the “Elect”. Usually, when I find myself in the mainstream, I start having to re-evaluate my thinking. I start having visions of mass hysteria.
Yeah. I like Jeff’s “OUTLAW” thing.
This ain’t Lake Woebegone. Half of the population is below average, and if I’m agreeing with them very often?
And that’s the name of that tune.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 18th, 2011 - 20:53
http://www.petitiononline.com/Hater123/petition.html
I enjoyed your column. Thanks for your rt
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 18th, 2011 - 21:36
Is Hersh an albino, by any chance?
And there are several banned words/phrases at Hot Air including “affirmative action”.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 19th, 2011 - 00:08
“Here is something that you will never hear from the media but that some witnessed shortly after the memorial service had finished….”
Dan,
I hope that the other Dan does not see this. You’d be crushing his illusions and he might never come back.
(I’d say it but I will complicit in your soul crushing endevour;-)
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 19th, 2011 - 00:09
oops,
I will not be complicit…
Carry on!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 19th, 2011 - 06:12
Bravo, Dan. Excellent and timely and well thought. It’s such a treat to read a thoughtful and yet pointed analysis that reflects the nature of the reaction to the tragedy.
Well done!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 19th, 2011 - 09:11
So, here we have the spectacle of a Jew warning Muslims that the Pope is trying to take over the world. Awesome.
Minor point, but we’ve long since returned Hersh’s foreskin.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 19th, 2011 - 11:40
Thanks Dan, the Bingleyfeast was fabulous!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
January 19th, 2011 - 15:41
I’m going to say nothing about Allahpundit and Hot Air. But I’m telling you, Dan, if you think you’ve done your last post about Jared Loughner, you’re wrong. You will blog about Loughner again. And you will link me.
BTW, did you know Zeitgeist compares 9/11 to the Reichstag fire? So that would be “Bush = Hitler,” and we know where that comes from, don’t we?
Maybe you won’t link that post, but eventually — and perhaps very soon — I’ll write something about Loughner and Zeitgeist that you can’t help linking. You’ll hate yourself for doing it, but you’ll link it.
Like or Dislike:
0
0