San Francisco “No Circumcision Zone” Sign Contest

28Apr/1112

San Francisco “No Circumcision Zone” Sign Contest

So the dick-obsessed dickheads of San Francisco figured that instead of dealing with matters of importance they would dick around by making circumcision in San Francisco punishable by a $1000 fine or a year in jail or both.

In honor of the notoriety they have brought on themselves, I would like anyone who's inclined to make up their No Circumcision Zone signs for the City to post at its borders, in case visitors plan on performing circumcisions (which should be safe, legal and rare, natch).

Best sign gets kudos.

Stacy will have posted about this, naturally, but since we go round and round on who was on the story first, I'm going to play this post.

Sorry not to have been around more today, but not feeling too well. Not as though I could have topped Enoch's patriotic German woman in push-up bikini, anyway.

Dan Collins

Dan Collins is a dude who blogs. He used to blog elsewhere. Now he blogs here.

Website - More Posts

Filed under: Too Lazy to Categorize Leave a comment

Comments (12) Trackbacks (0) ( subscribe to comments on this post )

Bob Reed
April 28th, 2011 - 21:07

So wait…What provisions are the multi-culti fetishists going to make for people who practice circumcision for religious reasons; say Jews or, ahem, muslims ?

Seems rather, oh, insensitive if you ask me…

That said, why am I not surprised that there would be a great interest in little boy’s penises among most of San Fran’s more colorful citizens.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
jefferson101
April 28th, 2011 - 22:47

Well, I can understand the concern!

They did that to me when I was a baby, and I couldn’t even walk for almost a year after the operation!

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
- Dustin
  April 29th, 2011 - 03:18
  
  LOL.
  
  Anyway, I’m grateful I had this done. I guess I’ll never really understand why people can’t leave this one to parenting. It’s cleaner and it saves lives (reduces infections of HIV and other diseases). The world would be better if everyone had parents who did this, but at the very least, let parents make the call. Leave something to culture and free choice.
  
  For some reason, it seems like homosexuals are particularly interested in banning this practice. Can anyone clue me in as to where that comes from, if I’m correct about that?
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )
SarahW
April 29th, 2011 - 11:06

Dustin, I was curious for years about that. Finally went looking for answers that went beyond the usual obsession with loss of control or sexual dysfunction complaints ( often code for I’M UNCONSCIOUSLY GAY and not having sufficient fun with ladies).

It’s often framed as a human rights/ social power issue – but of course, sexual practices and sexual satisfaction are drivers of the attention paid this issue – and anger at being cut off from them, no pun intended — in particular, “Docking”. Which I am sad to say I know what that means.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
- Enoch_Root
  April 29th, 2011 - 11:23
  
  “but of course, sexual practices and sexual satisfaction are drivers of the attention paid this issue – and anger at being cut off from them, no pun intended”
  
  BINGO.If we can just save ONE future Gay Man from lacking a foreskin!
  
  How can we deny them of the pleasures of… ahem… “docking”?
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )
Adam Wells
April 29th, 2011 - 12:17

I don’t want to know.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
J.M. Heinrichs
April 29th, 2011 - 20:19

Just point out that circumcision is a form of ‘docking’: “to cut off the end of; cut short: to dock a tail.”

Cheers

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
SarahW
April 30th, 2011 - 14:35

Except they mean something very different buy it, more along the lines of Apollo/Soyuz

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
SarahW
April 30th, 2011 - 14:36

I suppose the buy was a slip but it might apply in some situations.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
Dan Bollinger
May 1st, 2011 - 09:58

Actually, people who circumcise are the ones with the foreskin fetish. Those supporting the ban are asking for legislaion to make them keep their hands off boys’ penises.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
- Bob Reed
  May 1st, 2011 - 11:03
  
  So what do you say to those who’s religious beliefs motivate them to do so? That you know what’s good for them better than they do?
  
  Why should the government be involved in this at all? It is the epitome of meddling in the lives of the citizenry in a way that is antithetical to our ideals of personal liberty and religious freedom.
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )
- Dan Collins
  May 1st, 2011 - 11:24
  
  You know what, Dan Bollinger? You’re one of those people who think that it’s all right for a teacher to drive a 14-year-old to a clinic for an abortion undisclosed to the parents, but think it’s insanity that someone would choose circumcision for their child.
  
  I’ve got advice for you, dickhead: get your bullshit outta my face. You don’t like circumcision, go make your case to the public, but a) don’t go passing laws about this as though it’s a big fucking deal, you sex-obsessed twit, and b) when you all pose this as a human rights issue, you cheapen the whole idea of human rights.
  
  In short, it’s none of your G-D business what people choose for their children. Fuck off.
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )