Congrats on the new job, Mr. Mayor!
Hey Rahm, I hear tell you've got a new position and all sorts of bright, shiny things in store for you. What, one of your first appointees has had to resign because of ethics questions? Not even one week into your administration? Oh, buck up. Let's look at what else you're dealing with:
The former White House chief of staff, who won his mayoral bid handily Tuesday, takes charge of a city facing an immediate budget shortfall projected at from $500 million to $1 billion and with its long-term pension promises to city workers underfunded by as much as $15 billion — fiscal shortfalls Mr. Emanuel vowed during the campaign to address.
And while nobody expects a showdown with the unions as bitter as the one gripping neighboring Wisconsin, observers see coming painful negotiations with municipal unions similar to those other Democratic-leaning big cities and states have had to engage in recently.
How are you going to pay for this? Property tax hike? No? I don't think forensic audits are really going to do anything, either.
Surely, the state will be able to help. They've just issued a shitload of pension obligation bonds, sold with a spread of about 200 bps over Treasury bonds [i.e., the market thinks they need to be paid extra for this risk - comparable to some junk bonds]...oh wait:
Local school districts could get hit with a multimillion dollar bill under a pension cost-shifting plan being floated by a top state Democrat.
Senate President John Cullerton is proposing that school districts cover the costs of teacher pensions. Those costs -- estimated at about $700 million -- are now covered by the state.
That doesn't sound promising for Mayor Rahm.
Part of the issue is because Gov. Quinn went seeking federal guarantees to back those pension obligation bonds. Nothing doing. Seriously, fehgeddaboutit. But hey, if you like to live life on the edge... go for it! I think the ride down the Illinois debt death spiral should be fun. [vendors: have your bills been paid yet?]
And back to Rahm, I'm guessing that you're going to be doing more stuff like this. Because something's gotta give, and I think we've seen what direction the winds are blowing right now.
MORE: Unions guarded about Rahm win
AND: Maybe Rahm could spare a bit of his pocket change
REMINDER: A hole of 11K per Chicago resident. The numbers ain't pretty.
UPDATE: We've been contacted by the office of the Senate President about his proposal for teachers pensions. I quote from the statement:
Cullerton pointed out that this is already how the Chicago Public School system works. While that pension fund does receive a relatively small state subsidy, the local taxpayers and Chicago teachers cover the overwhelming majority of the pension costs. And Chicago taxpayers also support the downstate and suburban teacher pensions by paying state income and sales taxes.
Basically, Chicago has been on its own re: teachers pensions, more or less, already. So that's part of the debt problem that already exists, and this proposal wouldn't add to it.
Potential Chicago Mayors…. Run Away!
The Chicago pensions situation is going to get ugly, and fast.
First, from John Bury, some number-crunching on city pension plans. He explains his number-crunching therein, but looking at his spreadsheet - the Chicago pensions are not too hot. He does mention the over-100%-fundedness may be illusory here as his number-crunching doesn't allow for differential assumptions [firemen and police tend to have much lower retirement ages, but not really higher mortality in retirement]. Even so, the Chicago Firemen and Policemen's funds look awful.
So what's the word from the Illinois statehouse? A shiny present for the next mayor of Chicago:
After decades of making retirement promises they weren't fully paying for, Chicago and many suburbs could be forced to set aside more money under sweeping changes to police and firefighter pensions headed to Gov. Pat Quinn's desk.
The legislation, approved Thursday on a 46-4 Senate vote, prompted an immediate rebuke from Chicago leaders who said it was draconian and would force financial pain on city taxpayers.
"This goes to the economic vitality of the city of Chicago and the county of Cook, the economic engine of the state," Mayor Richard Daley said.
....
Few sides were left completely satisfied. Reform advocates said it doesn't go far enough. Police and fire unions took a hit with benefits cuts for new hires.Chicago was the most vocal opponent, unleashing an unsuccessful full-scale lobbying blitz to kill the bill because it said it would require a major property tax increase.
Supporters countered that the bill merely forces the city to start paying for its promises.
.....
Chicago leaders also complained of a key provision that changes how the city calculates the amount it sets aside for pensions starting in 2015, from multipliers of payrolls to more commonly accepted actuarial methods.The change may seem mundane, but a recent Tribune investigation found the current formula allowed the city to claim it adequately set aside enough money for pensions at the same time it cut deals to boost benefits that helped spike the debt. The city police and fire funds now have less than 40 percent of the money needed to cover the eventual pension benefits already earned by past and current workers.
"This is the first time that anybody has acknowledged that the multiplier used to fund Chicago's pensions doesn't meet its obligations," said Mike Shields, a trustee for the police officers' pension. "They've been lying to themselves for the past 20 or 30 years."
Remember how I keep saying Daley is running away because of the money situation, and that Rahm had better hope he's thrown out on a technicality?
The above is part of that. Illinois is unable to bail out Chicago [being broke itself], and for Chicago to be bailed out by the Feds requires the cooperation of the House Republicans. I don't see that happening.
MORE: Why is Daley making warnings now? When it's way too late?
My theory: he doesn't want to move. If it gets too ugly, he will have to leave Illinois at the least, the country at the worst. I'd be buying some land in Costra Rica if I were you, Daley.
EVEN MORE: From John Bury -- Chicago Police and Fire Pensions Still Dying
Shock! More Evidence of Chicagoans Corrupting City Officials
"It began with people I knew, usually friends from my years in construction, or their friends, coming and asking me for what seemed like little favors.
"At first, I looked upon it as sort-of a gift or thank you . . . . As the favors became more complicated . . . I began to go to other co-workers in the city and ask them for their help. Those co-workers, in turn, not only asked for money for themselves but made me feel that it was OK to accept and deliver money to them."
The other convicted city inspectors who were on the Sorich hiring list:
• Miguel Diaz, whose political sponsor was listed as Al Sanchez, the mayor's former streets and sanitation commissioner. Sanchez has been found guilty of rigging city jobs.
• Darryl A. Williams, whose sponsor was listed as former Ald. Ike Carothers (29th), who's now in prison for taking bribes.
• William Wellhausen, whose sponsor was listed as the 36th Ward Regular Democratic Organization.
• Eric C. Reyes and Thomas C. Ziroli, listed as having "union" sponsorship for their jobs.
Among those still awaiting trial in Operation Crooked Code: Dominick F. Owens, a city zoning inspector who also is on the Sorich list, shown as having been sponsored by the 41st Ward Regular Democratic Organization.
You know who I feel really sorry for? Ike Carothers, who was not only innocently drawn into the web of corruption by imprisoned real estate developer Cal Boender, but also, apparently, by this dreadful young man whom he sponsored. The citizens of Chicago must stop preying on their civil servants!
Just a quick reminder of what we’re dealing with here
When we install a Chicago-way crony rewarding thugocracy in the White House.
Despite getting $24.9 million from U.S. taxpayers, GE decreased its U.S.-based employees by 18,000 in 2009, according to the company’s 2009 annual report.
According to Standard & Poor's, GE took in $156 billion in revenue in 2009.
First of all, if GE enjoyed 156 billion dollars in sales last year, why did they need 25 million dollars of stimulus money?
Second, considering that they were the number one benefactor of the TARP federal loan guarantee program, parlaying thier ownership of two small Utah banks and thier "close relationship" with the Administration into being allowed into the program and subsequently issue more than 70 billion dollars of federally guaranteed debt:
Few corporations better represent the crony capitalism business model than GE. Hardly described as a bank, GE became a major recipient of the bailout, issuing some $74 billion in debt backed by taxpayers under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program-a program that GE persuaded the government to expand so it qualified as a recipient. At the same time, GE managed to avoid new federal restrictions on executive compensation required under the TARP program. [emphasis-ed.]
So, you know, I'm really thinkin' they really didn't need the extra stimulus money.
And I'll point out here that they still reduced thier work force by 18, 000 employees. Hmmmmm, I wonder if any of those jobs were outsourced overseas? I guess we'll never know for sure, at least in the short term. But, since some of the stimulus money they recieved was from the Dept. of Energy for "green jobs" research, and yet they actually reduced the number of employees, does this portend America sharing the same economic "benefit" as Spain did for going green?
Let's hope not, becuase I'd hate to see even more folks losing thier jobs in the name of progress ...
Obama to Democratic consultants: Stay off Fox, or else!
I'm finally starting to understand what's taking the administration so long to decide on General McChrystal's troop request; they're too busy waging a "good" war against...Fox news! Today's Chicago Tribune has a stunning story on the White House's efforts to intimidate Democratic political consultants from appearing as guests on Fox news programming:
At least one Democratic political strategist has gotten a blunt warning from the White House to never appear on Fox News Channel, an outlet that presidential aides have depicted as not so much a news-gathering operation as a political opponent bent on damaging the Obama administration.
[snip]
One Democratic strategist said that shortly after an appearance on Fox he got a phone call from a White House official telling him not to be a guest on the show again. The call had an intimidating tone, he said.The message was, "We better not see you on again,'' said the strategist, who spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to run afoul of the White House. An implicit suggestion, he said, was that "clients might stop using you if you continue.''
[snip]
White House Communications Director Anita Dunn said Thursday night that she had checked with colleagues who "deal with TV issues'' and they had not told people to avoid Fox. On the contrary, they had urged people to appear on the network, Dunn wrote in an email.But Patrick Caddell, a Fox News contributor and a former pollster for Democratic President Jimmy Carter, said he has spoken to Democratic consultants who have been told by the White House to avoid appearances on Fox. He declined to give their names.
Caddell said he had not gotten that message himself from the White House. "They know better than to tell me anything like that,'' he said.
Caddell added: "I have heard that they've done that to others in not too subtle ways. I find it appalling. When the White House gets in the business of suppressing dissent and comment, particularly from its own party, it hurts itself.''
For the most Post-Partisan!, Ethical!, Transparent!, administration-EVAR! this is a pretty disconcerting revalation. I guess it must be more of that New Kind of Politics! that Obama promised to bring to Washington, and on it's face appears to have a decidedly cliche Chicago flavor. It sounds like the old Hollywood admonishment, "You'll never work in this town again!"
In addition to outlining the fecklessness of this latest strategery, Cap'n Ed at Hot Air also points out that it is self undermining; not simply because of the bad press it may generate, but because it also undermines the credibility of the networks on which those strategists do appear! Doubtless, it may also serve to further increase the ratings of their target, Fox, even moreso than their entire petty vendetta has already...
But that seems to be the signature of this administration's use of Smart Power!





