POWIP Piece of Work In Progress

10Nov/102

Jesse the J; repealing O!-care equals “creeping genocide”

From Greg Hensler via AllahP, who characterizes this absurd exchange between renouned paragons of intellectual honesty Ed Schultz and Jesse Jackson as:

a sneak preview of the smart, sober rhetoric we can expect from the Party Of Ideas after the new GOP House is seated.

He then goes on to deliver some of his usual quality snark about the Democrats assenting to said genocide's continuing until 2014 in the larger interest of getting The Won re-elected.   He also reminds younger readers of Jesse's pre-1988 position that abortion-on-demand equaled, as well as aided and abetted, minority genocide; an opinion which the great wielder of absolute moral authority suddenly saw the light ! on when he decided to run for President.  I recommend both links; Allah's for the snark and Hensler's for laboring at the anthroplological exercise of capturing these imbeciles for all posterity.

I personally see this emerging meme as the supplement of race-baiter exraordinaire Eugene Robinson's  charade-cum-applied logic performance that, naturally, arrives at the conclusion that the Tea-Party's objections to Obama's policies can only be motivated by their racism...

Elementary Homey; it's RAAAAAAAACISM!11!1!

And now, in what seems like liberal one-upmanship, Jesse the J takes the argument from inanity and zooms waaaay out into left field; directly into a twilight zone of feverish lefty rhetoric-of-the-absurd.

Furthermore, putting aside the idiotic premise of the Rev. remarks, which is more breathtaking, Jesse J.'s assertion itself, or that some the same people that frothed at the mouth, gnashed their teeth, and tore at their garments because of Sarah Palin’s “death panel” characterizations see absolutely nothing wrong with this pinhead's rhetoric foil?

What do you think kind reader?   Which is more unbelievable, the assertion or the hypocrisy?  And are we perhaps seeing future TROOFER! memes in the formation stage?

Your opinions are valued, your responses considered, and your attention, and visits, to POWIP appreciated as always.

Share
15Oct/098

A Rush to judgement on hearsay alone?

The participation of radio entertainer Rush Limbaugh in a partnership interested in buying a stake in the NFL St. Louis Rams has caused a media firestorm this past week.  As part of that, Rush has been called out for his past statements, characterized by some as racist.  Of course there is his past criticism of Eagles QB Donovan McNabb as an overrated media darling who the media wished to succeed based on race, an opinion that I happen to disagree with, a characterization which got him summarily fired from his ESPN prime-time commentary gig.  But what should concern even the most disinterested parties are the oft repeated, but as yet still unsourced, alleged Limbaugh quotes involving James Earl Ray, the institution of slavery, and today’s newest talking points involving his membership at an exclusive Florida country club.

These fabricated quotes were introduced into the zeitgeist by talking heads, of course, at MSNBC and CNN, putting Rush in the unenviable position of having to prove a negative.  And sensing an opening, professional race-hustler Al Sharpton, armed with extorted corporate cash from his National Action Network, quickly joined the battle.  Now, following Dave Checketts’ letter removing Limbaugh as a member of the proposed ownership group, the Reverend Al is declaring Victory! over his long-time nemesis.  But were the racialist assertions of a grievance pimp, and the ensuing posturing pandering palaver of other owners as well as the NFL commissioner himself, the prime force in this action?

Or, could it have something to do with billionaire George Soros reported involvement or desire to be involved in the Rams ownership group.  It is unclear whether the shadowy Soros has been involved all along, or has recently expressed interest.  But, while much more low key than Rush, Soros is no less controversial or polarizing a figure.  So while many of the usual suspects on the “proggy side of the street” may be celebrating the put down of their long time foe, their resort to both an essentially ideological disqualification as well as the nuclear option of invoking racism may well mean that their Patron, Mr. Soros, may have to be scotched as well lest the obvious double standard soil the entire brand.

The bottom line on all of this is that if the league is going to rely on alleged statements to disqualify a person from owning an NFL franchise, they ought to at least make sure that those egregious remarks were actually made!  And they need to use independent investigators, because as with the Breitbart/Acorn sting, this episode has gone a step further in exposing the inherent bias of the legacy media as well as their willingness to propagate naked hearsay in order to advance the desired narrative.  As Toby Harnden put it:

The irony is, of course, that the people reporting this as fact are the same types who are always denouncing bloggers and the internet as forces of evil intent on destroying proper journalism – proper journalism being the kind that involves checking facts. In the case of Rush Limbaugh, however, it seems to be enough that the intention (i.e. to show the talk radio host is a racist) is considered pure.

[emphasis-ed.]

Especially vile is CNN’s Sanchez’s repeating of the unfounded rumor after receiving a free ride from the press for his own sin of running over a pedestrian while driving drunk, and then leaving the scene of the accident.  But all that aside, it’s OK to dislike Rush the entertainer for the things he actually says, after all, I'm sure he provides so much material on his daily 3 hour show that there’s no need for his ideological opponents, bent on once more making the political-personal, to make anything up; in their zeal to attach to him the most toxic, and lately the most recklessly applied, label there is in America…

UPDATE: The long walkback has begun.  HuffPo removed the phony quotations after only 3 years and 3 months; I'm glad their editors were so thorough.  And that twit Sanchez has twittered, "our bad", as a backhanded apology for the whole affair.  It doesn't matter anyway, their work is done; Limbaugh's chance at part ownership of an NFL franchise has been thwarted...

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

Share
27Sep/091

Keepin’ it real in Obama’s post-racial AmeriKKKa.

I guess Brother-man in Mississippi never got the memo:

An African-American man from Mississippi admits posing as a white supremacist to send a death threat across state lines by Facebook.
...
Hart admitted creating a name and using a white supremacists' photo to pose as a white man who planned to kill blacks because Barack Obama had been elected president.

Maybe he's just a method actor preparing for an upcoming part...NOT!  Or, maybe this is just another facet of the national conversation on race that the Popinjay-in-Chief palavers on about whenever he needs to rally the race-baiting troops; Eugene Robinson, Al Sharpton, and Jesse the J to the rescue!
(H/T Enoch in the comments)

Share
26Sep/094

Mark Steyn weighs in on the racism of Obama’s opposition.

Mark Steyn has a hilarious essay in Macleans in which he competely flames the most recent Democrat meme; that any opposition to Obama is a manifestation of racism.  It's a short read, and I suggest you take a few moments to start your Saturday laughing at a situation that otherwise is so pathetic it makes one want to cry.

Or, you know, throttle whatever pinhead is labeling you a racist...

As an aside, this is a perfect employment of Alinsky rule number 5, "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon."

Share
   

Switch to our mobile site